Real Estate

Old homes are a snapshot into history. Unique features like crown molding, wainscoting, arched doorways and stained glass windows make a statement that’s difficult to replicate with newer construction. 

If you’re looking to put down roots in a vintage home, consider that historic charm can outweigh the most tempting of today’s amenities. Some buyers seek out old homes for not only their charm but a sense of privacy that some newer homes with expansive and airy open floor plans can’t provide. 

To determine where old homes are most common, a new study from online lending marketplace LendingTree used Census data to analyze the share of old homes—defined as housing units built in or before 1939—in each of the nation’s 50 largest metropolitan areas.

The study found that not only are old homes much more common in some metros than they are in others, but their values can vary significantly relative to the value of all homes in a given area.

Boston, Buffalo, New York and Providence, Rhode Island are the metros with the largest share of homes built in or before 1939. An average of nearly 32% of homes in these areas were built in that time period, compared to an average of 11.3% across the entire country.

On the flip side, Las Vegas, Phoenix and Orlando, Florida, are the metros with the smallest share of old housing units. In these metros, an average of only 0.94% of homes were built in or before 1939.

While there are exceptions like San Francisco, metros with warmer climates usually have fewer old homes. Because they were built in an era before amenities like air conditioners were widespread, older houses tend to fare worse in the heat than newer ones do and, as a result, are less common in hot parts of the country.

The median value of homes built in 1939 or earlier varies significantly across the country. For example, in Washington, D.C., the median value of homes built in or before 1939 is $630,000, more than $200,000 higher than the median value of all homes in the area.

In Kansas City, Missouri, however, the median value of homes built in the same time period is only $112,400, which is nearly $71,000 cheaper than the median value of all homes in the area.

Here are metros with the largest share of homes built in 1939 or earlier.

1. Boston

Total housing units: 1,958,465

Percentage built in 1939 or earlier: 33.19%

Median value – all housing units: $437,500

Median value – housing units built in 1939 or earlier: $469,000

Difference between median value of all housing units and of units built in 1939 or earlier: – $31,500 

2. Providence, Rhode Island

Total housing units: 703,610

Percentage built in 1939 or earlier: 31.38%

Median value – all housing units: $276,900

Median value – housing units built in 1939 or earlier: $241,700

Difference between median value of all housing units and of units built in 1939 or earlier: $35,200

3. Buffalo, New York

Total housing units: 528,735

Percentage built in 1939 or earlier: 31.33%

Median value – all housing units: $148,500

Median value – housing units built in 1939 or earlier: $115,000

Difference between median value of all housing units and of units built in 1939 or earlier: $33,500

Metros with the smallest share of homes built in 1939 or earlier

1. Las Vegas

Total housing units: 899,870

Percentage built in 1939 or earlier: 0.39%

Median value – all housing units: $262,700

Median value – housing units built in 1939 or earlier: $207,600

Difference between median value of all housing units and of units built in 1939 or earlier: $55,100

2. Phoenix

Total housing units: 1,915,023

Percentage of housing units built in 1939 or earlier: 0.91%

Median value – all housing units: $250,000

Median value – housing units built in 1939 or earlier: $213,800

Difference between median value of all housing units and of units built in 1939 or earlier: $36,200

3. Orlando, Florida

Total housing units: 1,032,603

Percentage of housing units built in 1939 or earlier: 1.53%

Median value – all housing units: $221,600

Median value – housing units built 1939 or earlier: $260,000

Difference between median value of all housing units and of units built in 1939 or earlier: $38,400

Here are the 50 largest metros ranked by share of homes built in or before 1939.

If you’re thinking about buying an older home, LendingTree recommends considering the following factors:

Take into account extra costs associated with a home’s age. Older homes often require more extensive remodeling and maintenance than newer homes. As a result, it’s important to have the funds necessary to keep things like electrical wiring up to date.

Once you’ve lived in your house for a while and built some equity in it, you can consider using a home equity loan to pay for major projects like updating your kitchen or bathroom.

Make sure you have the right insurance. Because old homes can be costly to repair and more prone to damage, you’ll want to make sure your homeowners insurance will cover you in the event that something happens.

Keep in mind that you might need to shell out higher premiums than you would if you owned a newer house, depending on what shape the home is in.

Articles You May Like

Top Wall Street analysts prefer these dividend stocks for steady income
Former Bond Buyer reporter Chip Barnett dies at 67
How a homeowners insurance provision can help with living expenses after a natural disaster
Large deals, strong demand lead to bond insurance growth
Municipals cheapen ahead of another heavier supply week